This page is part of our decommissioning toolkit.
The table outlines what good practice should look like in some of the key areas relating to understanding needs and making a decision to decommission.
It identifies the risks of not following good practice and looks at how these risks might be mitigated and what actions commissioners can take when the timeframe is very tight and good practice is difficult to achieve.
Good practice | Risks of not following good practice | Mitigating these risks |
---|---|---|
Carry out a Needs Assessment exercise | Services are decommissioned that are needed and those that are re-commissioned do not meet needs: leading to unmet need, inefficiency and waste and potentially more, expensive services needing to be accessed later |
|
Involve users in assessing needs and gaps | Services are decommissioned that are needed and those that are re-commissioned do not meet needs: leading to unmet need, inefficiency and waste and potentially more, expensive services needing to be accessed later
Users unhappy with the final outcome of decommissioning Reputational damage |
|
Involve providers in assessing needs and gaps | Providers challenging the final outcome of decommissioning
Innovation in service design may be stifled Reputational damage |
|
Understanding the current and potential market of providers | Destabilising the provider base |
|
Understanding the costs and benefits of current provision | Inaccurate assessments made of the costs/benefits of decommissioning
May lead to more inefficient or expensive service being re-commissioned |
|
Related content
Table of contents
Decommissioning toolkit: Table of contents
Previous page
Practical example: Assessing need and making decisions